In a village, a dispute arose between Ravi and Vijay over a well. The well was located between their fields, and both families had been using it for years. The problem began when Vijay started building a wall around the well, claiming that it was his property. Ravi objected, arguing that the well was for public use and both families had equal rights over it. When they couldn't resolve the issue, the matter was taken to court.The court asked both parties to present their evidence. Ravi brought forward testimonies from village elders, who confirmed that the well had always been shared by both families. Additionally, he submitted old maps showing that the well was not officially registered as anyone’s private property. On the other hand, Vijay presented some documents claiming that the well was located on his family’s land and should belong solely to him.The court requested land records from the local revenue office and found that the well was indeed situated on the shared boundary and was not designated as private property. Furthermore, other villagers testified that the well had always been used collectively and had never belonged to just one person.Based on all the evidence and witness statements, the court ruled that the well would remain for public use and that Vijay could not claim exclusive ownership over it. The court also ordered the removal of the wall built by Vijay so that everyone could use the well as before.Following the verdict, Vijay had to give up his claim, and the villagers breathed a sigh of relief. This case taught the entire village that natural resources cannot be monopolized by a single person and that the judiciary plays a vital role in protecting the rights of all.The court asked both parties to present their evidence. Ravi brought forward testimonies from village elders, who confirmed that the well had always been shared by both families. Additionally, he submitted old maps showing that the well was not officially registered as anyone’s private property. On the other hand, Vijay presented some documents claiming that the well was located on his family’s land and should belong solely to him. In a village, a dispute arose between Ravi and Vijay over a well. The well was located between their fields, and both families had been using it for years. The problem began when Vijay started building a wall around the well, claiming that it was his property. Ravi objected, arguing that the well was for public use and both families had equal rights over it. When they couldn't resolve the issue, the matter was taken to court.The court asked both parties to present their evidence. Ravi brought forward testimonies from village elders, who confirmed that the well had always been shared by both families. Additionally, he submitted old maps showing that the well was not officially registered as anyone’s private property. On the other hand, Vijay presented some documents claiming that the well was located on his family’s land and should belong solely to him.The court requested land records from the local revenue office and found that the well was indeed situated on the shared boundary and was not designated as private property. Furthermore, other villagers testified that the well had always been used collectively and had never belonged to just one person.Based on all the evidence and witness statements, the court ruled that the well would remain for public use and that Vijay could not claim exclusive ownership over it. The court also ordered the removal of the wall built by Vijay so that everyone could use the well as before.Following the verdict, Vijay had to give up his claim, and the villagers breathed a sigh of relief. This case taught the entire village that natural resources cannot be monopolized by a single person and that the judiciary plays a vital role in protecting the rights of all.The court asked both parties to present their evidence. Ravi brought forward testimonies from village elders, who confirmed that the well had always been shared by both families. Additionally, he submitted old maps showing that the well was not officially registered as anyone’s private property. On the other hand, Vijay presented some documents claiming that the well was located on his family’s land and should belong solely to him. Submit