In a small town, a dispute arose between Mohan and Suresh over a shop. The shop originally belonged to Suresh’s father, but Mohan had been running it for a few years. The issue escalated when Suresh claimed ownership of the shop and asked Mohan to vacate it. Mohan, however, insisted that he had purchased the shop from Suresh’s father, while Suresh argued that the shop was inherited and had never been sold.When both parties failed to reach an agreement, the matter was taken to court. The court asked both sides to present their documents. Mohan submitted a sale agreement, which stated that he had bought the shop a few years ago. On the other hand, Suresh presented old property documents and claimed that there was no legal proof of the sale.The court carefully examined the documents and found that the sale agreement provided by Mohan lacked an official government seal and did not have any witness signatures. Moreover, the shop was still officially registered under Suresh’s father’s name. When the court requested records from the local municipal office, it was revealed that the shop had never been legally sold.Considering all the evidence and legal documents, the court ruled in favor of Suresh, affirming that the shop belonged to him. The court granted Mohan some time to vacate the premises and relocate his business elsewhere.After the verdict, Mohan accepted the decision and vacated the shop. However, the dispute created bitterness between the two families. The case became a topic of discussion in the town, serving as a valuable lesson for people about the importance of following proper legal procedures in property transactions. When both parties failed to reach an agreement, the matter was taken to court. The court asked both sides to present their documents. Mohan submitted a sale agreement, which stated that he had bought the shop a few years ago. On the other hand, Suresh presented old property documents and claimed that there was no legal proof of the sale. In a small town, a dispute arose between Mohan and Suresh over a shop. The shop originally belonged to Suresh’s father, but Mohan had been running it for a few years. The issue escalated when Suresh claimed ownership of the shop and asked Mohan to vacate it. Mohan, however, insisted that he had purchased the shop from Suresh’s father, while Suresh argued that the shop was inherited and had never been sold.When both parties failed to reach an agreement, the matter was taken to court. The court asked both sides to present their documents. Mohan submitted a sale agreement, which stated that he had bought the shop a few years ago. On the other hand, Suresh presented old property documents and claimed that there was no legal proof of the sale.The court carefully examined the documents and found that the sale agreement provided by Mohan lacked an official government seal and did not have any witness signatures. Moreover, the shop was still officially registered under Suresh’s father’s name. When the court requested records from the local municipal office, it was revealed that the shop had never been legally sold.Considering all the evidence and legal documents, the court ruled in favor of Suresh, affirming that the shop belonged to him. The court granted Mohan some time to vacate the premises and relocate his business elsewhere.After the verdict, Mohan accepted the decision and vacated the shop. However, the dispute created bitterness between the two families. The case became a topic of discussion in the town, serving as a valuable lesson for people about the importance of following proper legal procedures in property transactions. When both parties failed to reach an agreement, the matter was taken to court. The court asked both sides to present their documents. Mohan submitted a sale agreement, which stated that he had bought the shop a few years ago. On the other hand, Suresh presented old property documents and claimed that there was no legal proof of the sale. Submit