AGRAWAL STENO
Call us:
+91 8868822355, 9997878593
Please Wait a Moment
Menu
Dashboard
Register Now
C36 English (English)
Font Size
+
-
Reset
Backspace:
0
Timer :
00:00
Once upon a time, in a small village, there lived a farmer named Ramu. His land was situated near the riverbank close to the village. He worked hard in the fields and supported his family. But one day, a wealthy man from the same village, Shyamlal, laid claim to Ramu’s land. Shyamlal argued that a portion of Ramu’s land belonged to his ancestors, though he had no proof to back it up. Still, he managed to convince a few villagers to support his claim.At first, Ramu tried to explain that the land had been with him for years and that he had nurtured it with his own sweat. But Shyamlal refused to listen. He threatened Ramu, saying that if he didn’t vacate the land, he would take the matter to court. Ramu was scared, but he didn’t lose hope. He decided that if he had to prove the truth, the court was his only option. He sought advice from a knowledgeable person in the village and filed a case in court.The first hearing took place in court. Ramu presented the documents he had, which included old records of his land. He also explained that he had paid taxes every year and kept clear accounts of his farming. On the other hand, Shyamlal brought forward some witnesses who spoke in his favor. However, their statements had several contradictions. The judge listened to both sides and set a date for the next hearing.In the next hearing, Ramu called his neighbors as witnesses. They testified that the land had always belonged to Ramu’s family and that Shyamlal had no connection to it. Shyamlal presented his arguments again, but he lacked solid documents. His entire claim rested on verbal assertions and threats. The judge carefully examined the evidence and listened to the witnesses’ statements.In the final hearing, the verdict was announced. The judge stated that Ramu had all the proof of ownership, while Shyamlal couldn’t produce any concrete documents. The court ruled in Ramu’s favor and even ordered Shyamlal to pay compensation. Ramu’s hard work and honesty prevailed. The villagers praised his courage. This incident proved that if you have the truth on your side along with evidence, no one can do you injustice. Ramu saved his land and resumed farming, this time with even more enthusiasm.
Once upon a time, in a small village, there lived a farmer named Ramu. His land was situated near the riverbank close to the village. He worked hard in the fields and supported his family. But one day, a wealthy man from the same village, Shyamlal, laid claim to Ramu’s land. Shyamlal argued that a portion of Ramu’s land belonged to his ancestors, though he had no proof to back it up. Still, he managed to convince a few villagers to support his claim.At first, Ramu tried to explain that the land had been with him for years and that he had nurtured it with his own sweat. But Shyamlal refused to listen. He threatened Ramu, saying that if he didn’t vacate the land, he would take the matter to court. Ramu was scared, but he didn’t lose hope. He decided that if he had to prove the truth, the court was his only option. He sought advice from a knowledgeable person in the village and filed a case in court.The first hearing took place in court. Ramu presented the documents he had, which included old records of his land. He also explained that he had paid taxes every year and kept clear accounts of his farming. On the other hand, Shyamlal brought forward some witnesses who spoke in his favor. However, their statements had several contradictions. The judge listened to both sides and set a date for the next hearing.In the next hearing, Ramu called his neighbors as witnesses. They testified that the land had always belonged to Ramu’s family and that Shyamlal had no connection to it. Shyamlal presented his arguments again, but he lacked solid documents. His entire claim rested on verbal assertions and threats. The judge carefully examined the evidence and listened to the witnesses’ statements.In the final hearing, the verdict was announced. The judge stated that Ramu had all the proof of ownership, while Shyamlal couldn’t produce any concrete documents. The court ruled in Ramu’s favor and even ordered Shyamlal to pay compensation. Ramu’s hard work and honesty prevailed. The villagers praised his courage. This incident proved that if you have the truth on your side along with evidence, no one can do you injustice. Ramu saved his land and resumed farming, this time with even more enthusiasm.
Submit
Submit Test !
×
Dow you want to submit your test now ?
Submit