AGRAWAL STENO
Call us:
+91 8868822355, 9997878593
Please Wait a Moment
Menu
Dashboard
Register Now
Rajesh Case in English (English)
Font Size
+
-
Reset
Backspace:
0
Timer :
00:00
Rajesh was a middle-class businessman who lived a peaceful life with his family. He owned a small shop that provided his livelihood. One day, he was threatened by Rohan, the owner of a large business group, who wanted him to vacate his shop as he planned to buy the land and build a grand showroom there. When Rajesh refused, he began receiving continuous threats.A few days later, a fire broke out in Rajesh’s shop, destroying all his goods and property. When he filed a complaint with the police, no strict action was taken because Rohan was an influential person with strong connections in law enforcement. Realizing that he would not get justice through the police, Rajesh decided to approach the court.Rajesh filed a lawsuit with evidence. The court began hearing the case and allowed both parties to present their arguments. Rajesh’s lawyer submitted crucial evidence, including CCTV footage from nearby cameras, which showed some goons setting fire to the shop. These individuals were identified as working for Rohan.Additionally, several eyewitnesses testified that they had heard the threats and had seen Rohan’s men pressuring Rajesh to leave the shop. On the other hand, Rohan’s lawyer claimed that the fire was an accident and that his client was innocent.After a prolonged hearing and thorough examination of all the evidence, the court delivered its verdict. It found Rohan guilty and ordered him to pay proper compensation to Rajesh. Furthermore, he was sentenced for criminal conspiracy and destruction of property.This judgment not only brought justice to Rajesh but also proved that the law treats everyone equally, regardless of their social status or influence. The case became an example for small business owners who often face pressure from powerful individuals.The court’s decision demonstrated that the legal system is fair and impartial, ensuring that judgments are based on evidence and witness statements. This case served as a strong message to society that standing up against injustice can lead to justice being served.
Rajesh was a middle-class businessman who lived a peaceful life with his family. He owned a small shop that provided his livelihood. One day, he was threatened by Rohan, the owner of a large business group, who wanted him to vacate his shop as he planned to buy the land and build a grand showroom there. When Rajesh refused, he began receiving continuous threats.A few days later, a fire broke out in Rajesh’s shop, destroying all his goods and property. When he filed a complaint with the police, no strict action was taken because Rohan was an influential person with strong connections in law enforcement. Realizing that he would not get justice through the police, Rajesh decided to approach the court.Rajesh filed a lawsuit with evidence. The court began hearing the case and allowed both parties to present their arguments. Rajesh’s lawyer submitted crucial evidence, including CCTV footage from nearby cameras, which showed some goons setting fire to the shop. These individuals were identified as working for Rohan.Additionally, several eyewitnesses testified that they had heard the threats and had seen Rohan’s men pressuring Rajesh to leave the shop. On the other hand, Rohan’s lawyer claimed that the fire was an accident and that his client was innocent.After a prolonged hearing and thorough examination of all the evidence, the court delivered its verdict. It found Rohan guilty and ordered him to pay proper compensation to Rajesh. Furthermore, he was sentenced for criminal conspiracy and destruction of property.This judgment not only brought justice to Rajesh but also proved that the law treats everyone equally, regardless of their social status or influence. The case became an example for small business owners who often face pressure from powerful individuals.The court’s decision demonstrated that the legal system is fair and impartial, ensuring that judgments are based on evidence and witness statements. This case served as a strong message to society that standing up against injustice can lead to justice being served.
Submit
Submit Test !
×
Dow you want to submit your test now ?
Submit